An online course covering creative nonfiction, fiction and poetry.
Best for
Exploring several writing forms
Choose a writing or humanities summer program by matching reading, discussion, drafting and feedback to your goals, then checking revision time and tutor involvement.
What Succeed checks
We review public sources, provider information and recognised education-sector guidance, then focus on what helps students make practical decisions.
How official sources are used
We use official sources where available, especially for deadlines, eligibility, costs, availability and application details.
What Last verified means
Last verified is the latest date Succeed checked the key public information used in this guide. Details can still change after that date.
Why details can change
Opportunity details can change between review cycles. Always check the official source before applying or making a final decision.
Succeed's guidance is editorially independent. Providers do not approve or control the advice in our guides. If a provider relationship affects a page, we state it clearly.
Writing and humanities summer programs can combine reading, discussion and original work in different proportions. Start by choosing the activity you want to practice: shaping a story, developing a political argument, or interpreting historical and philosophical ideas. Succeed recommends using the comparison table as a framework for questions, with each program's syllabus establishing its actual teaching.
For a concrete writing example, Iowa Young Writers' Studio divides most residential core courses into seminars studying published work for craft and workshops discussing student drafts. The same instructor teaches both, with classes of ten or fewer students; its collaborative TV Writers' Room follows a different structure. Kenyon Review's residential workshops emphasize generating and sharing writing, revision feedback and individual instructor conferences, without formal grading.
Oxford Scholastica's residential politics course combines political discussion with research for a Model United Nations challenge, while its online World History & Philosophy outline includes a final research presentation with peer and tutor feedback. Succeed interprets these as different kinds of practice: a simulation develops an argument for a role, while a presentation explains an investigation. Browse creative writing programs and international relations programs to compare subject directions, then examine the assignments and feedback arrangements.
Choose a specific priority, such as revising fiction, discussing political ideas, or interpreting historical sources.
Common mistake: Avoid choosing from the subject title alone.
Request examples of required reading and assignments, distinguishing optional preparation from work completed during the program.
Common mistake: Avoid treating a suggested reading list as the syllabus.
Ask who comments on each assignment, whether feedback is written or spoken, and when students revise afterward.
Common mistake: Avoid equating group discussion with individual draft feedback.
Confirm who teaches, leads discussions and reviews work, including individual contact arrangements and possible tutor substitutions.
Common mistake: Avoid assuming a tutor biography guarantees that tutor.
Identify whether students create individual drafts, collaborative work or presentations, and request any grading or completion criteria.
Common mistake: Avoid treating a certificate as academic credit or publication.
Compare eligibility, English requirements, total cost, independent workload and live sessions in your own time zone.
Common mistake: Avoid assuming online study has no fixed commitments.
Before sharing personal essays or writing about identifiable people, clarify who can access drafts and whether readings, recordings or publication require separate permission.
| Dimensions | Creative writing | Politics and international relations | History and philosophy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading to compare | Published writing studied for craft | Theory readings and political case studies | Original sources and later interpretations |
| Discussion to compare | Responses to drafts and writing choices | Debate, competing interests and policy arguments | Interpretations, concepts and competing explanations |
| Drafting to compare | Stories, poems, essays or scripts | Arguments, position statements or speeches | Analytical writing or research presentations |
| Source analysis to compare | Close reading, perspective and nonfiction accuracy | Credibility, bias and competing political claims | Authorship, context, purpose and corroboration |
| Feedback to request | Specific tutor and peer comments on drafts | Comments on reasoning and supporting evidence | Comments on interpretation, sources and argument |
| Revision to request | Time to rewrite after critique | Time to refine arguments after discussion | Time to revise analysis after feedback |
| Tutor involvement to confirm | Workshop leadership, draft review, individual conferences | Discussion leadership, research guidance, argument feedback | Methods teaching, project guidance, analysis feedback |
| Assessment to clarify | Ungraded critique or stated grading criteria | Simulation, presentation or written assessment criteria | Research, presentation or essay assessment criteria |
| Ownership to clarify | Individual pieces or collaboratively written scripts | Individual positions or group resolutions | Individual investigations or group projects |
Use these options to compare creative writing, combined humanities study and political discussion across different formats.
An online course covering creative nonfiction, fiction and poetry.
Best for
Exploring several writing forms
An in-person Cambridge option combining creative writing with history, literature and philosophy.
Best for
Keeping several subject interests together
An online history and philosophy course with a final research presentation and peer and tutor feedback.
Best for
Exploring historical and philosophical questions
An in-person politics course with discussion and a four-hour Model United Nations challenge.
Best for
Exploring politics through discussion
Save your preferred options from the recommendations below, then compare their assignments, tutor contact and revision arrangements.
Save and compare these programsIdentify the writing or analytical skill you want to practice.
Separate required reading from optional preparation.
Confirm who reviews your individual work.
Ask when feedback arrives and when revision happens.
Clarify whether final work is individual or collaborative.
Distinguish grades, credit, certificates and publication.
Confirm eligibility, English requirements and your local session times.
Compare total costs, inclusions and cancellation terms.
| Age / year group | Best focus | Good opportunity types | What to prepare |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-14 | Experimenting with forms and expressing ideas | Introductory storytelling and broad subject courses | Reading interests, short writing examples |
| 15-16 | Using critique and supporting interpretations | Writing workshops, discussion courses, guided projects | A draft, subject interests, workload plan |
| 17-18 | Sustained revision and independent argument | Focused workshops, analytical courses, research projects | Revision goals, sample work, focused questions |
A venue identifies where study happens; teaching depends on the curriculum, instructor responsibilities and feedback arrangements.
Compare the operator and teaching arrangements separately from the location.
Kenyon Review's ungraded workshops include revision feedback and individual instructor conferences.
Ask what feedback you receive and how you can act on it.
Planning or developing a collaborative series is a classroom activity; publication involves separate arrangements and permissions.
Clarify the actual deliverable, authorship and any publication process.
A presentation describes an output; it does not establish whether students learn source provenance, corroboration or citation methods.
Request examples of the methods taught and the assessment criteria.
Use your preferred learning activity and practical requirements to narrow the options before comparing individual syllabi.
Step 1 of 4

Selection reviewed by
Co-founder, Succeed | Founder, Immerse Education (2012–2026)
Sean works at the intersection of academic enrichment, program quality and university preparation, with expertise in evaluating pre-university experiences for ambitious secondary school students.
Use this guide to build a shortlist, then find matching opportunities in Succeed.