Submission deadline
15 November 2026
Optional early submission for written comments; March round.
Research Question Prize
by Aldevere
An academic essay contest that challenges you to explain a difficult question clearly, show why simple answers fall short, and identify what remains uncertain.

What Succeed checks
We review public competition details such as eligibility, cost, entry format, deadlines, recognition and submission requirements.
What Last verified means
Last verified is the latest date Succeed checked the public details shown on this page. Competition details can still change.
How official sources are used
Succeed uses official provider information where available, then rewrites it into a student-facing summary for comparison and planning.
Why some dates are reference dates
If the current cycle is not available, Succeed may show the latest verified cycle dates so you can understand typical timing.
Succeed is independent from this provider unless a partnership is clearly stated.
Current status
Open now
Eligibility
Students worldwide; individual entries
Age range / Year group
Ages 14-18
Location / Region
Online
Cost
Free
Prize highlight
$500 + 50% scholarship, capped at $3,000
Entry format
Online essay; PDF or Word
Explain a genuinely difficult academic question to a curious younger reader, rather than simply arguing for an answer.
Your explanation should reveal the key ideas, disagreements and remaining uncertainty, using plain language and concrete examples.
This suits students who enjoy digging into why an apparently simple question becomes complicated and want to test their understanding through writing.
The Research Question Prize is an academic essay competition run by Aldevere, a research mentorship provider. Its challenge is to explain a difficult question in any academic subject to a curious 12-year-old, making the problem understandable without pretending it has an easy answer.
You choose your own question and explain the important ideas, disagreements and gaps in knowledge behind it. Academic staff and mentors read entries anonymously against four published criteria, emphasizing your thinking rather than impressive vocabulary or an elaborate bibliography.
The younger-reader brief tests whether you understand a question well enough to explain it without hiding behind jargon.
Choosing your own academic question gives the work a clear connection to your interests.
The criteria reward honest uncertainty and fair explanations of disagreement, rather than a forced conclusion.
Anonymous judging and conflict-of-interest recusals make the assessment process explicit.
The originality rules draw a clear boundary between language checking and outsourcing the thinking.
Students who enjoy investigating academic questions and want to practice explaining complexity in their own words.
You want a fixed subject prompt, a conventional persuasive essay, or to reuse work already submitted for assessment.
This is worth considering if you want a focused test of understanding rather than another broad essay assignment. Explaining where a question becomes difficult can give you useful practice for research proposals and academic interviews, especially when you choose something you already care about.
The main limitation is that a concise explanation still needs careful reading and revision; a famous topic does not compensate for shallow understanding. Treat the work as an opportunity to develop your thinking, and describe any recognition accurately rather than assuming it will determine a university decision.
Effort level
Moderate, with substantial reading if the question is unfamiliar.
Best started
A few weeks before submission, allowing time for reading and revision.
Main challenge
Making the explanation simpler without making the question falsely easy.
Choose a question you have encountered in a lesson, book or problem.
Read reliable sources and note why a simple answer is insufficient.
Test a draft with a reader unfamiliar with the topic and revise confusing steps.
Useful if
You want to identify gaps in your understanding before a research project or interview.
You build a short explanation around a question whose answer is genuinely difficult. The aim is to help a younger reader understand the problem, the competing ideas and the uncertainty that remains.
Choose a question in an academic subject you care about.
Identify what the question asks and why an obvious answer falls short.
Explain the essential concepts with plain language and concrete examples.
Present relevant interpretations or disagreements fairly.
Show what remains uncertain, contested or unanswered.
Cite your sources and prepare an anonymous submission.
Submission deadline
15 November 2026
Optional early submission for written comments; March round.
Research Question Prize, March 2027 submission deadline
15 March 2027
Research Question Prize, November 2026
15 August-15 November 2026
Final essay submission deadline.
Research Question Prize, March 2027
15 January-15 March 2027
Final essay submission deadline.
Competition opens
15 August 2026
November 2026 round.
Results notification
10 December 2026
All November-round entrants notified by this date.
Prompt announcement
15 December 2026
March 2027 question announced.
Competition opens
15 January 2027
March 2027 round.
Results notification
10 April 2027
March-round results due by this date.
| Milestone | Date | Timezone | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Submission deadline | 15 November 2026 | Local | Upcoming | Save deadline |
Research Question Prize, March 2027 submission deadline | 15 March 2027 | Local | Upcoming | |
Research Question Prize, November 2026 | 15 August-15 November 2026 | Local | Active | |
Research Question Prize, March 2027 | 15 January-15 March 2027 | Local | Upcoming | |
Competition opens | 15 August 2026 | Local | Past | |
Results notification | 10 December 2026 | Local | Upcoming | |
Prompt announcement | 15 December 2026 | Local | Upcoming | |
Competition opens | 15 January 2027 | Local | Upcoming | |
Results notification | 10 April 2027 | Local | Upcoming |
Students aged 14-18 at the closing date.
Any country, school system or academic subject.
One individual entry per student per round.
Work must not have been submitted for assessment elsewhere.
Under-18 entrants provide a parent or guardian's name and email.
No Aldevere enrollment or school permission required.
Entry cost
Free — No account or program purchase required.
What's included
Certificate for every valid entry., Written mentor comments for essays submitted by the feedback cutoff.
Prepare your essay as a PDF or Word document without your name.
Complete the prize form with your age, year group, country, school and subject.
Provide a parent or guardian's name and email if you are under 18.
Upload the document, enter its word count and complete the originality declarations.
Submit through the official form, or email hello@aldevere.com if your school network blocks it.
Save this competition in Succeed, keep the deadline visible, and track your progress before you submit.
Start your entry checklistChoose one question from your selected subject area. Succeed shows a small preview here, but always check the current competition instructions before writing.
Your essay document stays anonymous; identifying details belong in the entry form.
Maximum 1,000 words, excluding references.
English language.
PDF or Word document.
Maximum file size: 10 MB.
No entrant name in the document.
Original work not previously submitted for assessment.
Sources cited where used; fabricated citations disqualify.
AI limited to spelling and grammar checks.
Declare permitted AI use in an excluded end note.
First place
One award per round, plus a 50% Aldevere program-fee scholarship capped at $3,000 and a winner's certificate.
Second place
One award per round, plus a 35% program-fee scholarship capped at $2,000 and a winner's certificate.
Third place
One award per round, plus a 20% program-fee scholarship capped at $1,000 and a winner's certificate.
Highly Commended
A Highly Commended certificate, with no fixed number of awards.
Demonstrating subject engagement and discussing your own academic work.
University admission or publication in an indexed scholarly journal.
Polish, ornate vocabulary and a long bibliography are not criteria in themselves.
Compare these writing competitions if you prefer a different academic brief or a more personal form of explanation.
Challenging questions beyond the school curriculum
Best for
Students who prefer developing and defending an academic argument.
An independently chosen history essay
Best for
Students who want to pursue a historical question in depth.
A personal essay responding to 'Build a bridge'
Best for
Students who prefer personal reflection to explaining an academic problem.
Save this competition in Succeed to compare it with other essay prizes, deadlines and entry formats in one place.
Compare with other competitions
Content reviewed by
Co-founder, Succeed | Former secondary teacher and educational leader
Ben works at the intersection of education, technology and school adoption, with expertise in how secondary schools evaluate data-driven tools and how education technology is used in practice.
Succeed uses official provider information where available, but keeps this public page focused on comparison and planning inside Succeed.
Entry deadlines checked
Eligibility requirements reviewed
Entry form reviewed
Prize conditions checked
AI restrictions reviewed
Publication consent reviewed
We use source material to verify core facts, then show older cycle dates as reference when a current cycle is not available. Always check current submission instructions before entering.